Claudia schreef op 3 oktober 2010:
er bestaat maar 1 g-d en dat is de G-d van Abraham, Isaak en Jakob de G-d van Israel.
Reactie:
Beste Claudia,
Wat een indrukwekkende argumenten! Ik ben meteen om!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bart Klink
ClaudiaClaudia schreef op 3 oktober 2010:
Reactie: Beste Claudia, Wat een indrukwekkende argumenten! Ik ben meteen om! Met vriendelijke groet, Bart Klink |
Wie zijn er online?We hebben 19 gasten en geen leden online Geef je mening
Welke positie over het bestaan van god(en) onderschrijft u?
Bekende atheïsten![]() CitaatIt is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies? ~ Richard Dawkins |
Claudia schreef op 3 oktober 2010:
er bestaat maar 1 g-d en dat is de G-d van Abraham, Isaak en Jakob de G-d van Israel.
Reactie:
Beste Claudia,
Wat een indrukwekkende argumenten! Ik ben meteen om!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bart Klink
We hebben 19 gasten en geen leden online
It is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?
~ Richard Dawkins